Do Not Pay Improper Bonuses

JAN 4, 2013 12:03pm ET
Comment (1)

I am increasingly asked about whether subjective "performance" bonuses payable to loan officers are compliant.

In a word: NO! In theory, it is true that a truly subjective bonus paid to a loan officer having nothing to do with the terms of the loans closed would not violate LO comp rules.  In reality, no one will ever believe that a subjective bonus paid to a loan officer isn't somehow ultimately fueled by his or her profitability. Further anyone who believes that paying a "subjective" bonus somehow avoids the LO comp issues by labeling it as subjective is only fooling themselves.  First, remember that the rule specifically includes the proxy rules.  Hence, if subjective discretion is a proxy for profitability it is still a clear violation. Moreover, it is incredibly simple to demonstrate a pattern or correlation between comparative bonus amounts and the profitability of individual LOs. Indeed, all an examiner has to do is chart the bonuses and the HUD-1s to determine whether a trend exists. If such a correlation is identified a lender would quickly find itself in very hot water.

The fact if the matter is that examiners are well aware of the fact that improper bonus payments are common. This is and will remain a hot button issue for examiners. As such, for lenders who are still willing to take this “risk,” you cannot say no one warned you.

Comments (1)
What if the bonus is tied to hiring and retention or an objective measure of customer service and are clearly documented? Your assumption that all subjective measures are proxies for a company's short term profitability may be slightly over over reaching.
Posted by | Friday, January 04 2013 at 3:53PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
MultimediaSee All »