RBS Set for Biggest Loss Since 2008 After $5B Provision

Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc set aside a further 3.1 billion pounds ($5 billion) to cover legal and compensation claims, putting Britain’s biggest bailed-out lender on track to post its largest pretax loss since 2008.

The provision includes 1.9 billion pounds for lawsuits and fines tied mostly to the sale of $91 billion of mortgage-backed securities from 2005 to 2007, according to the lender. It follows agreements Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and UBS AG struck with U.S. regulators to settle claims they didn’t provide adequate disclosure about mortgage-backed debt sold in the housing bubble that preceded the 2008 financial crisis.

RBS Chief Executive Officer Ross McEwan is attempting to overhaul the lender by eliminating assets and jobs. He said in November the bank would log a “substantial” full-year loss after 4.5 billion pounds of writedowns. His efforts are being hobbled by the cost of past regulatory missteps. More than five years after giving RBS the biggest bank bailout in history, the government still hasn’t been able to cut its 80% stake.

“This looks like a new CEO’s attempt to clear the decks and draw a line under the matter,” said Joseph Dickerson, an analyst at Jefferies International in London with a buy recommendation on the stock.

“When the crisis broke, the bank was involved in a number of different businesses in multiple countries that have subsequently faced heavy scrutiny by customers and regulators,” McEwan said in a statement. “The scale of the bad decisions during that period means that some problems are still just emerging.”

RBS may now post a loss before tax and gains and losses on its own debt of about 6.8 billion pounds for 2013, said Gary Greenwood, an analyst at Shore Capital in Liverpool, England, who previously expected the loss would be about 3.3 billion pounds. It would be the biggest since 2008, when the lender posted a loss of about 8.3 billion pounds, he said. The company is slated to report full-year results on Feb. 27.

Eight top executives, including Chris Sullivan, head of the corporate unit, and Les Matheson, acting head of the consumer division, won’t now receive bonuses for 2013, Edinburgh-based RBS said. McEwan, who replaced Stephen Hester in October, had already waived his.

Even so, the lender is in talks with shareholders, among them the government, to get permission to pay employees bonuses of up to twice their base salary.

“The right position of the business is to be commercial,” chairman Philip Hampton told reporters on a conference call. “The ability to pay competitively is fundamental to the prospects of the business.”

The provision includes 465 million pounds for customers sold insurance on loans they didn’t require, 500 million pounds for clients wrongly sold interest-rate hedging products, and a further 200 million pounds for legal expenses, the lender said.

That brings the total RBS has aside to compensate clients mis-sold payment-protection insurance to 3.1 billion pounds, putting it third among British banks after Lloyds and Barclays Plc. RBS said that rather than declining as expected in the final three months of the year, claims continued at the previous quarterly rate of about 225 million pounds.

The provision for mis-sold interest rate hedging products brings the total for RBS to 1.3 billion pounds.

The charges led the bank to cut its forecast for its core Tier 1 capital ratio, a measure of financial strength. RBS expects the ratio will be about 11% at the end of 2013, or as much as 8.5% under the latest rules set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. That’s down from the company’s estimate of 11.6% and 9.1% in November.

“Fronting up to our past mistakes is very expensive, but RBS is a much stronger bank that can deal with these costs on its own while running a good capital position,” McEwan said on the call. “Dealing with these litigation and conduct issues is essential if we are to move the bank forward.”

JPMorgan said in November it had agreed to a $13 billion settlement over its sales of mortgage-backed securities. Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank last month paid 1.4 billion euros ($1.9 billion) to settle claims that it didn’t provide adequate disclosure about mortgage-backed securities sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Zurich-based UBS agreed to pay $885 million to the two mortgage financing companies in July.

Comments (2)
It has since been posted her and on facebook as well as going live on twitter
saveourdream.blogspot.c o m/2014/01/washington-mutual-loans-and-chase.html
Posted by Deborah L | Tuesday, January 28 2014 at 9:53AM ET
Well if anyone is interested, I know now, after a long hard struggle how at least JP Morgan /Chase does business, especially concerning the so called LOANS THEY NEVER HAD FROM WASHINGTON MUTUAL. Its quite the puzzle , but when you talk to bankers , that they screwed over , the puzzle unravels. For those of you who went to Chase and asked them to look for your note from WAMU and were dealing with Deutsche Bank , or Archbay at the time ( or possibly another bottom feeder ) what happens is ( in my case anyway) you have a department called home-lending Dept Of recovery, which is run by Mike Boyle, who research your notes. They decide on which notes were forgiven that belonged to Washington Mutual ( first and second notes) because Chase wanted them off record and not have to deal with them and that loss was cheaper than the court cost etc. Now if you were a lucky candidate , one or both were written off, unless a bottom feeder like Deustache Bank (or DB STRUCTURED PRODUCTS, Archbay, etc)sold them illegally as NPLS to Hedge Funds and hoped to get away with it , but was caught,than goes to Chase and pays Chase pennies on the dollar to get one of them notes and than Chase writes off the other note ( if there was one, I had a second one that after Chase claiming to own BOTH my notes writes off the second as SATISFIED )and writes an assignment dated years after the purchase ( mine was over 5 years later)and suddenly the bottom feeder claiming to own the note who never had the paperwork in all these years comes forward with it , and Chase suddenly no longer has it and states it made a mistake it never owned the loan,( because it has now been sold and destroyed in Chase records) than congratulations , your puzzle is now solved. Chase who believes they can get away with it and has with I am sure thousands of people, is now gonna get caught in its own web of deceit, because I plan on making this even more public , in order for lawyers and courts and people who were abused to know how it works.
Posted by Deborah L | Tuesday, January 28 2014 at 8:32AM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.