Hensarling, 55, is the new chairman of the House Financial Services Committee while Waters, 74, is the highest-ranking Democrat. In addition to grappling with proposals to tweak and amend the Dodd-Frank regulatory law, they will be seeking common ground on what may be the panel’s biggest issue this year—the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
For Hensarling, the solution is to abolish the government-owned mortgage companies and completely privatize the mortgage market. Waters argues that some government involvement is needed to preserve the 30-year fixed home loan.
“While we clearly have profound philosophical differences—some might call us Capitol Hill’s newest odd couple—we are exploring areas of common concern where we hopefully can work together,” Hensarling said in an email.
Because Hensarling is among few in Congress who would end all U.S. backstops to the mortgage industry, he may have to compromise even to win over his own party. That makes it likely the two lawmakers eventually will support a plan that would shrink the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac without threatening to choke off the flow of money into home loans.
Since he was first elected to Congress in 2002 from the Dallas area, Hensarling has risen steadily in the Republican leadership. He led opposition in the House to the $700 billion banking bailout in 2008, suggesting it would put the U.S. on a “slippery slope to socialism,” and voted against the Dodd-Frank Act regulatory overhaul two years later.
“Jeb is a believer—sort of tea party before there was a Tea Party—so certainly there are some things he won’t sign on to,” said Mark Calabria, a former top Republican aide for the Senate Banking Committee and who now directs financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute. “But there are some areas Maxine won’t sign on.”
Waters was a teacher and volunteer coordinator with the Head Start early childhood education program before running for Congress in 1990 from Los Angeles.
Her relationship with the financial industry often has been tense. In 2011, at a Congressional Black Caucus event in Los Angeles, she called bankers “gangsters” and said if they “don’t come up with loan modifications and keep people in their homes that they’ve worked so hard for, we’re going to tax them out of business.”
As she moves into a more prominent role on the committee, Waters has sought to repair those ties, meeting with lobbyists and hosting roundtable discussions on issues including derivatives rules.
Waters also has begun holding campaign fundraisers that include lobbyists for the biggest banks. That’s a first, according to the lobbyists, though Waters’ chief of staff, Mikael Moore, said he couldn’t confirm that.
“There are some folks in the industry meeting her for the first time and they don’t have a relationship,” said James Ballentine, executive vice president of congressional relations and political affairs at the American Bankers Association. “Relationships are established over time.”
Pressing ahead with housing would be a new path for the Financial Services Committee, which for five years has focused on other areas of bank regulation under the chairmanships of Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Spencer Bachus, a Texas Republican. The Dodd-Frank Act, passed while the chamber was under Democratic control in 2010, imposed new rules on much of the industry but didn’t address Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Hensarling and Waters will have to deal with fixes to Dodd-Frank, some considered technical and others more substantive.
Among proposals with bipartisan support are alterations to the law’s derivatives provisions. Other changes, including a Republican proposal to replace the director of that bureau with a five-member commission, have lawmakers split along party lines and may lead to prolonged debates, even if the Democratic-controlled Senate is unlikely to take them up.
Still, with the departure of Bachus, who is prevented by term limits from continuing as chairman, and the retirement of Frank, Hensarling and Waters both said they consider mortgage finance the most important piece of unfinished business.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have drawn almost $190 billion in taxpayer aid since 2008, when they were seized by regulators as they veered toward bankruptcy in the credit crisis. The Treasury Department in February 2011 unveiled three options for winding down the companies. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said the administration would settle on a plan by the middle of 2012. A blueprint hasn’t yet been released.
“We’ve ended up in limbo here,” Waters said in an interview. “No real proposal coming either from the White House or from Congress about exactly what we want to do.”
The debate over the companies’ future has been complicated by their prominence in the housing market. As private investors have pulled back in the recession, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have come to own or guarantee more than 60% of outstanding U.S. residential mortgages. The real estate industry is among those lobbying to retain a government hand in the market to avoid another sudden collapse in prices.
“You can’t pull the rug out from that in a year or two or even five,” said Rep. John Campbell, a Republican from California, who has offered a bill to replace the companies with privately capitalized entities that would purchase government backing for the mortgage bonds they issued.