Quantcast

S&P Ratings Suits Barred from U.S. Courts in Win for States

JUN 3, 2014 4:59pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
Comment
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+
Partner Insights

McGraw Hill Financial Inc.'s Standard & Poor's unit must go to state court to face claims by 18 states and the District of Columbia alleging inflated ratings of securities in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, a federal judge ruled in a victory for state officials.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan today rejected S&P's arguments that attacks by the states on its "issuer-pays" business model raise national concerns that must be heard in federal court. In one of the cases transferred today, Moody's Investor’s Service Inc. was also named as a defendant.

The states claim S&P misrepresented that its credit ratings on mortgage securities were independent and objective. In 17 of the cases, the states claim S&P misled their residents in violation of state consumer protection laws. In two other cases, S&P sued to block states that were about to file their own suits in state court.

"At bottom, the disputes in these cases are disputes arising under state law that belong in state courts," Furman said.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.