Servicing

The PMI Group Inc., Walnut Creek, Calif., has priced its common stock offering at $6.15 per share, paving the way for a capital raise of more than $700 million. Its convertible senior note offering will carry an interest rate of 4.5%. PMI estimates the aggregate net proceeds from the concurrent offerings to be approximately $706 million, which is an increase from an initial offering of $400 million in common stock and $200 million in notes. PMI, which closed Monday at $6.46 per share, was selling for $5.87 per share in early afternoon trading.

As anticipated, Senate Republicans stood together and blocked the Senate from starting debate on a game changing financial services reform bill. The Democrats needed 60 votes to bring the bill-crafted by Senate Banking Committee chairman Christopher Dodd-to the floor to start the amendment process. But early Monday evening the final vote fell short, 57-41. One Democrat, Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, voted against the bill. Nelson was concerned that the treatment of derivatives in the Dodd bill would force Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway to post additional collateral against its $63 billion derivative portfolio. The vote is a setback for Democrats who were betting adverse publicity about Goldman Sachs and their role in the mortgage crisis would compel some Republicans to vote for a motion to proceed with the bill and start debate. Democratic leaders plan to have more votes this week, showing that its party wants to reform the way Wall Street works and protect consumers. "We will not tolerate efforts to slow-walk this process or water down this reform because it is too important to middle-class families in Nevada and across American," said Senate Majority Leader Harry, D-Nev. Meanwhile Sens. Dodd and Richard Shelby, R-Ala., are expected to continue working on a compromise. After the vote, Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said Dodd has been involved in negotiations with Republicans for months. The Ohio Democrat said the GOP initially intended to stall the bill for months. They want "to delay and kill the bill," Brown said.

As the Federal Reserve begins looking for ways to reduce its $1.1 trillion of agency MBS holdings, a group of private sector policy analysts are advancing a proposal that would finance the transfer of agency MBS back to the GSEs. The move, the Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee argues, would allow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to manage and liquidate the assets. "It would place housing debt on the books of Fannie and Freddie where it belongs and remove the Fed from financing U.S. housing policy," according to the group which laid out its ideas at a meeting sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute. Under the proposal, the Treasury Department would issue Treasury debt to Fannie and Freddie and the GSEs would swap the debt for the MBS. As MBS are sold or the mortgages run off, the GSEs would pay Treasury back. Financial consultant Bert Ely said Fannie and Freddie might do a better job of managing the MBS than the Fed-if the GSEs do not overspend on hedging interest rates and prepayment risk. The Treasury note should be structured as a pass-through, he said, "so they don't feel compelled to go out and waste money on Wall Street on hedging." Fed staff estimates the agency MBS portfolio will have a run-off rate of $200 billion a year, according to the Shadow Regulators. Credit Suisse mortgage analysts view the annual run-off rate as too high. They estimate the Fed experienced close to $50 billion in runoff in 2009 mostly due to prepayments. "This year we estimate $100 billion in run-off," said Mahesh Swaminathan, a mortgage strategist at Credit Suisse. During 2009, the Fed was buying agency MBS on a weekly basis, eventually accumulating $1.1 trillion in MBS. The Fed stopped its buying spree in March.

Housing prices in February posted their first annual increase in more than three years, according to a new reading of the closely watched Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller home price index. However, not all was rosy in the new numbers. Despite the 0.6% increase on a nonseasonally adjusted basis, 11 of the 20 cities in the index experienced declines. Las Vegas-one of the hardest hit cities in the nation in terms of price declines-saw the largest annual drop at almost 15%. Tampa saw prices fall 6.1% with Seattle down 5.6%. Among cities showing a gain, San Francisco was on top with a 12% improvement year-over-year. The last time prices rose on a year-over-year basis was in late 2006. On a sequential basis, the index declined from January by 0.1%. Before that, there were eight consecutive monthly increases. Some housing economists think home prices may have bottomed out in the fourth quarter, but few are predicting any significant gains in equity during the year ahead, especially with federal tax credits tied to home purchases expiring this month.

Mortgage industry and consumer groups are urging members of the House Financial Services Committee to vote against an amendment that would raise the minimum downpayment on Federal Housing Administration loans to 5%, from the current 3.5%. "Increasing FHA's downpayment could disenfranchise more than 300,000 responsible homeowners," eight groups say in a letter to the committee, warning such a hike could derail the fragile recovery in housing. Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., claims FHA is making too many risky loans and the downpayment increase is needed to protect taxpayers. The Financial Services Committee is expected to vote this week on Garrett's 5% downpayment amendment as it marks up an FHA reform bill. The bill (H.R. 5072) includes several proposals to adjust FHA annual and upfront mortgage insurance premiums to replenish the agency's mortgage insurance fund. The Garrett amendment would "do little to strengthen FHA's capital reserve ratio," the eight believe. The organizations that put their name on the letter include the Mortgage Bankers of America, National Association of Realtors, National Association of Home Builders, Center for Responsible Lending, Consumer Federation of America, National Fair Housing Alliance, National Consumer Law Center and National Council of La Raza.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is currently juggling 3,000 open mortgage fraud cases, but is facing challenges managing its resources. Speakers at an industry trade show on mortgage fraud told attendees that rather than spend more money to prosecute fraud, government agencies must utilize their available resources to be as smart and as effective as possible. Ninety-three U.S. attorneys across the nation are working to determine enforcement efforts to fit the needs of individual cases in local communities, said John D. Arterberry, executive deputy and fraud chief of the Justice Department's criminal division. "Each U.S. attorney has the opportunity to tailor his or her enforcement," he said. "The needs in the Northern District of Illinois are going to be different than Fargo, N.D., compared to what is happening in Phoenix or Washington, D.C.," said Arterberry. Speaking at the same show, which was put together by the Mortgage Bankers Association, FHA officials said they are spending an increasing amount of their time focusing on risk while carefully reviewing early payment defaults for signs of fraud. Vicki Bott, deputy assistant secretary for single-family housing at FHA, said the agency is stepping up enforcement through its Mortgagee Review Board. "We are not afraid to take action on lenders who are doing fraudulent activity," she said. "We are looking at how principles of lenders jump around. We are really beefing up our process around loan-level review. We are bringing delinquencies into our cycle of reviewing."

Ed Raice, a former president of EMC Mortgage Corp., the nonprime mortgage arm of Bear Stearns, has raised private equity money and is in the hunt for a bank, preferably one near his home in Connecticut. Raice, in a brief interview with National Mortgage News, confirmed that he has an interest in buying First Bank of Greenwich, a $55 million asset FDIC-insured depository that has been in business for about three years. He declined to identify his backers. His interest in returning to the banking sector comes at a time when several Congressional panels are closely scrutinizing Wall Street's role in the credit and subprime crisis. However, Raice left EMC and Bear back in 2002, long before subprime lenders began to think of loan underwriting as something they could avoid. EMC was headquartered in Texas.

FHA single-family originations stabilized in March at the $22.7 billion level with the "seriously delinquent" ratio falling below 9% for the first time since November. The Federal Housing Administration reported that lenders originated $22.7 billion of FHA-insured loans in March, up slightly from the $22.3 billion funded in February. FHA monthly originations averaged $23.7 billion in the first quarter, compared to $28.8 billion in the fourth quarter. The government-backed product accounts for about 25% of all new fundings nationwide. Meanwhile, FHA reported that 8.8% of its insured single-family loans are 90 days or more past due, down from 9.17% in February and 9.4% in January. The drop in serious delinquencies may be signaling that FHA's $807 billion single-family portfolio has turned the corner, allowing its insurance fund to rebuild its depleted capital reserves. The positive news also might give Democratic members of the House Financial Services Committee more ammunition to shoot down GOP amendments to tighten FHA underwriting, including a hike in downpayments to 5% from the current 3.5% requirement. The committee is expected to vote on the amendments and approve a FHA reform bill late Tuesday afternoon.

Lender Processing Services, a third-party service provider to the mortgage industry, earned $76.7 million in the first quarter, compared to $60.6 million in the same period a year ago. LPS reported consolidated revenue of $592.4 million for the first quarter of 2010, an increase of 11.8%, compared to the first quarter of 2009. "LPS is off to a strong start in 2010 despite difficult market conditions and a challenging broader macro-economic environment," said Lee A. Kennedy, executive chairman of the company. "Our loan facilitation business posted record growth in a sluggish year-over-year origination market as we continued to gain market share." He noted that the firm's default services division posted strong gains as well.

Top executives at two credit rating agencies defended themselves Friday against charges that, to retain market share, they knowingly issued inflated ratings on mortgage-backed securities before the financial crisis and put off making needed changes in their standards. Officials from Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's tried to rebut a congressional report regarding their actions, arguing that they had been public about flaws in the mortgage market and had made changes to better adjust to risk. "Moody's did see the escalating housing prices and the loosening of standards in subprime lending practices, we published on these observations, and we incorporated our more unfavorable views into the way we assigned ratings," said Raymond McDaniel, chairman and CEO of Moody's, in a hearing by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. But former employees of S&P and Moody's painted a much different picture, telling lawmakers that executives pressured analysts to maintain market share. They were discouraged, they said, from raising questions about the credit quality of some loans backed by mortgages. Eric Kolchinsky, a former director of Moody's derivatives group, testified that in October 2007, days after the firm downgraded $33 billion in subprime bonds, he was reprimanded by e-mail because quarterly market share fell to 94%, from 98%.