Cramdown Amendment Could Crop Up Again.

Financial services executives would like to think the cramdown issue is dead for this year, but it could crop up again — sooner than expected. On Thursday, the Senate killing a cramdown amendment offered by Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill. was widely anticipated. (The amendment would have allowed bankruptcy judges to reduce the principal amount of mortgage on a primary residence.) But House leaders want to keep the issue alive and they may attach a cramdown amendment to a conference report on an FDIC/housing bill. The House has already passed the bill that includes improvements to the Federal Housing Administration's 'Hope for Homeowners' program, legal protections for servicers, and more borrowing authority for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The Senate is expected to pass a similar bill in a few days now that the Senate has voted down the Durbin cramdown amendment. On the eve of that vote, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D- Fla., told a Mortgage Bankers Association that House leaders plan to attach a cramdown provision to an FDIC/housing bill in conference with the Senate. "We look forward to working with you on a revised bill once the legislation returns to the House side," Rep. Shultz said. Voluntary modifications are not working and "doing nothing is simply not an option," she added. The congresswoman chairs an appropriations subcommittee. The next day, the Senate voted down the Durbin amendment by a 45-51 vote. "Given the resounding vote in the Senate, the conference report probably will not include cramdown," said Scott Talbott, chief lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable. "Cramdown appears to be dead for this year," he said.