Morgan Stanley asked a judge to dismiss a suit filed by MetLife Inc. over mortgage-backed securities, saying the insurer knew the U.S. housing market was starting to deteriorate before it bought most of them.
The New York-based insurer knew that underwriting standards for mortgages had started to deteriorate and had already begun to reduce its exposure to mortgage-backed securities by mid-2007, before it made 36 of the 52 purchases at issue in the case, Morgan Stanley attorneys said in a court filing.
“Not only did MetLife invest more than $50 billion in mortgage-backed securities, one of their affiliates originated the mortgages that are alleged to be fraudulent in this case,” James Rouhandeh of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, an attorney for New York-based Morgan Stanley, said during today’s hearing.
MetLife, the largest U.S. life insurer, sued Morgan Stanley in April, accusing the investment bank of fraud and other claims involving $757 million in residential mortgage-backed securities purchased in 2006 and 2007.
MetLife said Morgan Stanley told it that the loans backing the securities were originated based on “specific underwriting guidelines” and collateralized by properties that had been “accurately appraised.”








