Market Ripe for Mortgage M&A, but Bid-Ask Presents Challenge
Mounting compliance costs, squeezed margins and the end of the refinancing gravy train are expected to prompt more mergers and acquisitions among mortgage lenders—provided buyers and sellers meet halfway on price.
That's always the hard part.
Previously, sellers wanted prices based on past production volumes, while buyers wanted to set prices based more on what future volumes were likely to be. Now, both sides may feel they have a better handle on operating costs and market pricing than they did when interest rates began climbing last year, or before the wave of new regulation hit in January.
Mortgage banking profit margins are "getting less worse," says Trevor Reinhart, a manager of advisory services at Englewood, Colo., industry consulting and accounting firm Richey May. (Margins on loans increased by 28 basis points during the first quarter from the previous quarter, his firm estimates, as lenders offset new regulatory restrictions on borrower fees by increasing their rates.) As a result, the bid-ask spread for mortgage companies has narrowed slightly, Reinhart says.
Still, "There's always going to be tension" between buyers and sellers, Reinhart says.
"We're not seeing a ton of deals go through," he says.
Some deals are occurring. Chicago-based home lender Guaranteed Rate, for example, recently bought the assets of Overland Park, Kan.-based FirsTrust Mortgage, a top 10 lender in the Kansas City metropolitan area. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.
"I think we're going to see more deals or hear of more as the year progresses, and it will continue next year," says Mark Stafford, managing director and founder of New York-based private investment banking and corporate finance advisory firm MS Capital Advisors.
If a lender is going to sell, this may be the best time to do it, says Brian Koss, an executive vice president at Danvers, Mass.-based lender Mortgage Network.
"This is the height of value you are going to get," he says.
His company, a retail home loan lender that originates about $2.5 billion annually, primarily on the East Coast, has no plans to sell or buy, he says. His experience with a range of public and privately held lenders over time leads him to believe the best course is to stay with a private-held lender with sufficient capital resources, but without investor-driven pressure to expand in a slower market cycle.
When acquisitions do occur, they may be in the form of strategic geographic asset purchases or branch rollups rather than purchases or mergers of companies, says Koss. Lenders' value resides primarily in the form of loan officers who can help bolster volumes and effective managers who have assembled and retained teams of such players, he says. Some owners who quit the business prefer to sell employees and management teams for this reason.
"If you don't lock up people" as part of the merger or acquisition, the deal can easily lose value quickly because that talent can defect soon after to another shop, Koss says.
Having originators who can efficiently produce sufficient loan volume is a key part of what is driving acquisitions today, says Stan Middleman, chief executive of Mount Laurel, N.J.-based Freedom Mortgage Corp. Lenders that originate below a certain volume may have trouble remaining profitable given how thin loan margins have been because they lack economies of scale, he says, but this in part depends how strong a company's operations are and how much its volumes have fluctuated.
The required compliance and information technology required to handle loans given rising costs could challenge players that produce much less than $500 million a month, he says. Per-loan origination costs have been steadily rising, according to MortgageStats.com surveys. As of the first quarter of this year, they had increased on average to $4,044 from $2,714 a year earlier.
But the business' rising costs are not necessarily squeezing only smaller players, Middleman says.
"If you're small enough you can manage your expenses by getting smaller. It's the people in the middle, whatever you would define the middle to be, that are the most challenged, and they have to decide whether they are going to get smaller or bigger" to bring their operations in line with current volumes, origination costs and margins, he says.
Middleman feels that prices are currently fair. "At the end of last year was the peak of the seller's leverage. That's when they were profitable and they could tell somebody 'no' and mean it. They rebounded a little, but I don't think they're as optimistic coming into the third quarter," he says.
This year Freedom bought the assets of San Diego-based BluFi Lending, a mortgage lender with five branches in California and Nevada. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but Middleman says he was pleased enough with the results to continue selectively buying in areas or channels that allow his company to expand without overlap with its current operations.
Some are even more optimistic about buying prospects.
"I absolutely think it's a buyer's market," says Stafford. "The sellers don't have many alternatives."
But some buyers are under pressure as well, Koss says.
Certain buyers that remain short on originations because they had a refinance-focused business prior to the change in interest rate environment last year are under more pressure to buy than their acquisition targets are to sell, says Koss. These buyers want to find sellers who are better positioned for the current market environment than they are, and the number of those types of players that are available for sale is dwindling. As a result, some buyers "are a little more aggressive," Koss says. As a result, he feels some deals will get done at higher prices than they normally would be.
Because some companies are under pressure to buy, "It's pretty much a sellers' market," according to Chuck Klein, a managing partner at Austin, Texas-based advisory firm Mortgage Banking Solutions who specializes in M&A.