Judge Tosses Baltimore's Suit Vs. Wells

A U.S. district court judge has ruled in favor of Wells Fargo Bank NA and dismissed a lawsuit by the City of Baltimore seeking reimbursement for expenses and loss of revenues due to foreclosures and vacant homes. The city alleged that Wells Fargo targeted minority neighborhoods with subprime loans, which lead to foreclosures and deterioration of inner city neighborhoods. Judge Frederick Motz noted in his opinion that the bank is responsible for only a "negligible portion" the city's vacant properties and other factors such as high unemployment, drug use and violence also are factors. The city's allegations of a "casual connection between Wells Fargo's alleged misconduct and the damages the city claims is not plausible," the judge ruled. The opinion says the number of vacant homes in Baltimore range from 16,000 to 33,000 and the city has identified only 401 vacant properties involving Wells Fargo loans. "From the beginning, we have consistently maintained that Baltimore's economic problems could not be attributed to the small number of foreclosures Wells Fargo has done in Baltimore," said Cara Heiden, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. "We are pleased the court's decision rejects the city's claim and reflects this point of view." Judge Motz has opened the door for the city to file an amended complaint that seeks damages for "specific houses that became vacant allegedly because of Wells Fargo's lending activities." No comment from the city was available at press time.