With regulators clamping down on captive title reinsurance arrangements, three of the nation's largest title insurers say they have ended or will end these arrangements.First American, Fidelity National, and LandAmerica have been in the crosshairs of regulators in Colorado, California, and Washington over such arrangements. John Garamendi, California's insurance commissioner, has described the arrangements as "phony" and said homeowners have been victimized in the amount of over $1,000 per home. LandAmerica struck back, challenging the comments as untrue and misleading. Michelle Gluck, LandMark's executive president and general counsel, declared that the arrangements "have not resulted in any injury to consumers" but that the company has "voluntarily ended these arrangements in Colorado and is in the process of doing so nationwide." First American filed a statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission Feb. 18 saying it had entered into an agreement with Colorado regulators without admission of liability or wrongdoing. It will pay affected policyholders nationwide "to avoid even the appearance of mistaken or improper conduct," and as a result will take a $24.0 million pretax charge to its fourth-quarter 2004 earnings. Fidelity said it will continue to cooperate with Mr. Garamendi's office and noted that it had previously announced its voluntary discontinuance of all reinsurance agreements.
-
While the nationwide purchase average declined nearly 3% in 2025, these costs rose in 23 of 50 states and the District of Columbia, a study from LodeStar said.
14m ago -
Priority Financial Network CEO Marc Shenkman allegedly told a former employee to "keep his resume out there" because he planned to get Lendwise shut down.
4h ago -
Technology and customer service were the two largest categories within operational expenses last year, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.
June 29 -
Bright partnered with real estate data and analytics platform HouseCanary to deliver exposure on Google at no additional cost or operational efforts.
June 29 -
The move may have been related to the government-sponsored enterprise's duration gap but could also have resulted from many other considerations.
June 29 -
The lawsuit is the third against a California-based mortgage company this month after revelations of another early-2026 incident at a wholesale lender.
June 29







