What are sales people missing? Nothing! Ask them, and invariably that’s the response you’ll get. Nothing! I hear it more frequently than most because I’m in the sales training and coaching business.
The first question I always ask a prospective client is, “Have you ever had any formal sales training?” If they answer, “Yes;” I then ask them to explain where, what, when and by whom? Boy do I get a collection of answers that never ceases to inspire me.
For most, they associate sales training with product training−not. For those that actually participated in formal sales training, it was not awe-inspiring nor was it as effective as they hoped. None of which surprises me.
Regardless of the initial response I receive, my next question is always, “Do you believe attending sales training would be beneficial?” Here comes the strange part; most sales people recognize the benefits of sales training and/or having a sales coachbut it’s not in their plan (I’m being kind to suggest some sales people have a plan).
For companies and/or sales people, the basic question to ask prior to any sales training has to do with
Another sales plan might acknowledge the attributes and possible benefits of sales training but only as it applies to an internal source of training. A third plan addresses the cost factor and whether in this challenging economic environment this is where their monies should be spent. Well, the good news is that in all of the above instances in fact a plan does exist. The not so good news is that most of these plans are misguided. But, the other good news is that these deficiencies are easily rectified.
When a company or individual identifies only one aspect of selling as a deficiency they are missing the opportunity to improve on other selling segments. The issue, I’ve found, is who in this scenario is identifying and determining the selling deficiency. More important than whom is the question of the criteria being used and the expertise (or lack thereof) as it relates to the decision-maker.
The second scenario regarding internal sales training programs is more delicate and sensitive (although I’ve never been accused of either trait). Sales managers and/or human resources people who are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal sales training programs can be somewhat territorial. The only suggestion I would make relates to any review process established to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of any such programs.
The last issue relative to this discussion relates to the cost of sales trainingone of the most prevalent objections I encounter when discussing my company’s sales training and coaching programs. When done successfully, sales training and/or coaching is cost effective. If attending a sales seminar results in one more lead, one more selling opportunity and, ultimately, one more saleis that worth the cost of training?
In closing, I must share with my readers that the majority of companies and individuals that have a sales training plan, or have participated in a sales training seminar or program, verbalize to me that it was not worth their time or energy. For this I apologize. I apologize, not for myself, but for those who had an inadequate sales training plan or did not possess the expertise to effectively improve the selling process. As one illustrious football coach once stated (to paraphrase): it’s not practice that makes perfectit’s perfect practice that makes perfect! Having a sales coach, an internal sales training program or attending sales training seminars won’t necessarily have the desired results if the latter exercises are not done by perfect coaches or trainers.
That begs the question on how best to evaluate a perfect sales trainer or coach and/or a training program? For answers to this, and many other questions like these please watch for answers in my future articlesorfeel free to contact me.
-
The Housing for the 21st Century Act includes provisions covering policy, manufactured homes and rural infrastructure introduced in a prior Senate proposal.
9h ago -
Mortgage loan officer licensing saw its first rise since 2022 as Fannie Mae projects $2.4T in 2026 volume. Experts eye a market reset amid improving affordability.
February 6 -
The FHFA chief told Fox an offering could be done near term - but may not be - while a Treasury official addressed conservatorship questions at an FSOC hearing.
February 6 -
The secondary market regulator will formally publish its own rule on Feb. 6, after a comment period and without making changes to what it proposed in July.
February 6 -
Bowing to industry pressure, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is warning consumers with notices on its complaint portal not to file disputes about inaccurate information on credit reports, among other changes.
February 5 -
The mortgage technology unit at Intercontinental Exchange posted a profit for the third straight quarter, even as lower minimums among renewals capped growth.
February 5




