NOV 8, 2012

Related White Papers

Hidden Cost of Compliance
Harnessing Traditional and Alternative Data to Improve Loan Quality at All Risk Levels
Compliance Matters

HUD Audits of Direct Endorsement Lenders Increasing

Print
Reprints
Email

FACTS

Private National Mortgage Acceptance LLC purchased a property at a foreclosure sale. The company then served the renter, Kamie Stanko, a three-day “pay rent or quit” notice claiming she had stopped paying her monthly rent of $2,500.  Stanko had not paid rent in over a year racking $22,500 in back rent.  Stanko was never a tenant of plaintiff Private National. When the case was filed Stanko offered to pay rent but plaintiff refused.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lawrence H. Cho said judgment for the defendant tenant. New owners of foreclosed properties are required to give tenants 90 days’ notice before eviction under the three-year-old Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act. The tenant’s motion to quash the eviction complaint was granted. The judge also ruled that any back rent would accrue from the filing of the 90-day notice and not before. (Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company LLC v. Kamie Stanko / 11U04495-2-27-12 Santa Monica Court)

MORAL

What was the attorney reading when the notice was given knowing it was foreclosure property?

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WOMAN PLEADS GUILTY IN OREGON FEDERAL COURT TO $20 MILLION MORTGAGE FRAUD

FACTS

On Oct. 31, Wanda Coleman pleaded guilty in federal court in Portland, Ore., to mail fraud charges for orchestrating a mortgage fraud scheme that used fraudulent loan applications and supporting documents to convince lenders to fund more than $20 million in loans on approximately three-dozen properties in Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties in California.

She pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud pursuant to a plea agreement filed under seal in United States District Court in Portland. As a result of the guilty plea, Coleman faces a statutory maximum sentence of 30 years in federal prison when U.S. District Judge Michael H. Simon sentences her on Jan. 25, 2013.

The case against Coleman was brought by the United States Attorney’s Office in the Central District of California following an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case was transferred to the District of Oregon, which is near Coleman’s new residence, for the entry of the guilty plea and sentencing.

Coleman and several co-conspirators fraudulently obtained funds from financial institutions by making false statements on, and omitting material information from, loan applications submitted to purchase houses in the names of straw buyers. Coleman identified properties for sale across Southern California and offered to pay the sellers substantially more than their asking price, in return for the sellers’ agreement to refund the excess amount to Coleman or companies that she controlled. Coleman recruited straw buyers to submit fraudulent applications for loans to buy the houses. Various participants in the scheme prepared fraudulent mortgage applications that contained false information regarding the buyers’ employment, income and assets, and then submitted the bogus applications to lenders. To corroborate the false claims, co-conspirators forged bank statements and prepared other fraudulent documents, which were submitted to lenders.

As a result of the scheme, financial institutions funded loans totaling more than $20 million in relation to approximately 30 properties across Southern California. The straw buyers ultimately defaulted on the loans, resulting in foreclosure of the properties and losses of more than $11 million to the lenders.  Usattycdca103112)

MORAL

Note that the criminal complaint was filed “under seal.” What that generally means is the defendant is cooperating with authorities, agreeing to be “wired” and cooperate in catching others who do not know or whom it is reasonably believed do not know the person has been arrested and indicted. Look to seeing quite a few more arrests and indictments in the near future in Southern California. If anyone did any creative loans with Coleman, I suggest you see an attorney now as opposed to later. That is presuming the prosecutor’s office or special agents have not already contacted you by now.

FLORIDA FORECLOSURE SOLUTION SPECIALISTS DRAW FIVE-YEAR PRISON TERMS AFTER PLEADING GUILTY

FACTS

On Nov. 2, Lisa Wright and Cathy Saffer were sentenced to serve 66 and 60 months, respectively, for defrauding homeowners and mortgage lenders as part of a foreclosure rescue scheme. U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in the Southern District of Florida sentenced the two women.

Wright pleaded guilty on March 27, to one count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, one count of mail fraud, and one count of wire fraud. Saffer was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, three counts of mail fraud, and two counts of wire fraud, following a two-week jury trial in July.

Wright and Saffer operated Foreclosure Solution Specialists from 2006 to 2009. Through FSS, Wright and Saffer targeted homeowners facing foreclosure, advertising that FSS could assist those homeowners in remaining in their homes. When contacted by distressed homeowners seeking assistance, Wright and Saffer misrepresented to those homeowners that their homes would be sold to investors. They also claimed that customers could remain in their homes after the sales and promised them an opportunity to repurchase the homes at a later date. Rather than selling the homes to legitimate investors, Wright and Saffer designed sham sales to straw purchasers whom they paid to participate in the scheme.

Wright and Saffer paid certified public accountant Barrington Coombs to write a fraudulent letter that falsely vouched for the fraudulent information on various loan applications. Coombs, who was also convicted by the jury, is scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 7.

Mortgage transactions completed by FSS drew equity out of the homes, which Wright and Saffer pocketed for their own purposes. After doing so, Wright and Saffer allowed the loans to go into foreclosure. Homeowners ultimately lost all of the equity in their homes, and most of the victims were forced to move out of their homes.  (usattyfl11212)

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:


A daily video that gives you mortgage news, plus a little attitude.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.