-
The agency sought to provide certainty that most actions from the past eight years remain in effect despite the ruling that the bureau's leadership structure is unconstitutional.July 7
-
The Supreme Court threw out a key statutory provision concerning the agency’s leadership structure, but the presidential election and possible legislative reforms could bring about more changes to the embattled bureau.June 29
-
With just 13 decisions remaining on the docket this session, the high court's highly anticipated ruling in a case challenging the agency's leadership structure could come as early as next Monday.June 25
-
A lawsuit filed Tuesday argues that the bureau's establishment of the panel looking into regulatory changes violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act.June 16
-
Democratic lawmakers, state attorneys general and others filed briefs with the Supreme Court rebutting claims that the agency’s leadership structure is unconstitutional.January 24
-
The Supreme Court appointed Paul Clement to represent the agency after the bureau’s current director questioned its constitutionality.January 15
-
The case before the court deals mainly with a statutory clause limiting the president’s ability to fire a CFPB director. But briefs filed with the court say striking that provision does not fully solve the bureau’s constitutional problems.January 3
-
The agency’s director previewed a policy for companies under enforcement action to have their orders terminated if they comply ahead of schedule.December 2
-
The agency’s director previewed a policy for companies under enforcement action to have their orders terminated if they comply ahead of schedule.December 2
-
The high court scheduled oral arguments on March 3 in the lawsuit dealing with a president's ability to fire the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.November 26
