Quantcast
New rules conditionally allows an LO to receive a bonus based on the profit of his or her employer's mortage-related business. Image: Fotolia.
New rules conditionally allows an LO to receive a bonus based on the profit of his or her employer's mortage-related business. Image: Fotolia.

Paying Cash Bonuses to LOs

JAN 25, 2013 5:43pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
Comments (3)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

As many know, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released its new LO compensation rule, which included a provision that loan officers could receive bonuses based upon the profit of their employer’s mortgage related business, so long as (1) the bonus did not exceed 10% of the individual loan originator’s compensation over the relevant time period and (2) the compensation was not paid based on the terms of the individual loan officer’s transactions. To explain it differently, the CFPB is now permitting a payment of up to 10% of a loan officer’s income in bonus of any sort, be it through a predetermined formula and/or a subjective assessment, so long as that bonus is not based upon the terms of the loans originated by the loan officer.

While this change does provide flexibility it is important to note that it is only a small percentage of a loan officer’s income and it cannot be used to pay a bonus on the terms of the loans closed by the originator.  While many lenders will be tempted to use the bonus subjectively to “gross up” a loan officer based upon his/her loans, a better practice is to use a set of objective and subjective factors to prevent a pattern of conduct that would ultimately lead to the conclusion that the lender was using the bonus to improperly compensate based upon the terms of the loan. In other words, lenders should use an objective set of performance factors having no relation to profitability to determine eligibility to receive the bonus. Thereafter, subjective criteria—still not tied to the terms of the transaction—could be utilized without great concern that any patterns would correlate to loan terms. The fact that legitimate objective eligibility criteria first must be satisfied would essentially negate an accusation that the bonuses was merely being paid to gross up loan officers based upon the terms of loans closed. 

Stay tuned, the new regulations provide a ton of changes and new clarifications. My weekly blog is going to be focusing on all of them in the coming weeks.

Comments (3)
While I understand the motivations of the CFPB in trying to prevent some unscrupulous LOs from steering borrowers, I find something seriously wrong with government telling private enterprises how much they can pay their employees. What will be the next directive? LOs can't make more than $75k/year? Where does it end? We are on a very slippery slope.
Posted by Russell M | Thursday, January 31 2013 at 2:12PM ET
If an LO made 75K our less, we wouldn't have needed all this oversight..
Posted by Joe D | Thursday, January 31 2013 at 3:03PM ET
Your comment is spot on LO. It is seriously wrong for the government to set incomes, especially while the CEO's can reap all they want. As to Jomama, I don't know what the "average" or "Median" income is for LO's but I would venture to guess in my market most LO's make less than 75K. What insures this is those working for banks make way less bps since the LO comp rules.
Posted by | Wednesday, February 06 2013 at 1:29PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.