Could Remax Hasten the Resurgence of the Wholesale Channel?

Ed. Note: This is the first of two parts. Read part two here.

Remax wants to replicate its successful real estate franchise model in the mortgage broker business.

Because a franchise is an independent business, it avoids the type of compliance issues that made regulators look askance at MSAs and joint ventures. "Any negativity or anything they do [in terms of] poor business practices, regulation-wise they are their own stand-alone business," said Gregg Harris, a St. Louis area mortgage broker who has been trying to bring the LenderCity franchise concept to market.

A franchise structure could mitigate any concerns about possible RESPA violations that a joint venture or an MSA had, said Campbell, who follows both Realogy and Remax. Realogy and PHH are currently dealing with a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District for the Central District of California, Strader v. PHH Corp., alleging the venture violates RESPA as a result of the parties referring business to one another under agreements or arrangements, Realogy said in a regulatory filing.

Ultimately, the lawsuit should not be an issue for PHH and Realogy, "but it's one of those things that has a created an overhang on those stocks," Campbell continued.

Motto was created to replace the MSAs that many small and midsized (and even a few larger ones) Remax franchises had up until the CFPB crackdown in the summer of 2015. There were approximately 1,700 of the 3,500 Remax franchises with an MSA of some sort, said Motto Mortgage President Ward Morrison.

Motto's units will be operated as mortgage brokerages. Mortgage brokers bring clarity and loan product options to the consumer, said Dave Liniger, CEO of Denver-based Remax Holdings Inc.

"What's happened is the big banks have consolidated their power [in mortgage lending] but in doing so they have taken away choice and transparency to the consumer. So we just think the time is perfectly right" to bring Motto to market, Liniger said.

If a real estate broker wanted to get into mortgage banking, "they had to put in a large amount of capital, they had to go out and get a warehouse line, and they had to be a correspondent lender with somebody.

"And we felt that the mortgage brokerage business was the one with the least amount of capital upfront that they needed to put in, it is still regulated but there is not as much risk for them. That was the key," Morrison said.

Profits from PHH Home Loans benefit the corporations that own it. The franchise model means the operators get the profits from the mortgage loan. "We wanted to come up with a concept that would support the individual real estate broker," said Morrison.

With affiliated business arrangements, any payments must be based on the equity ownership stake that each party holds in the venture. Similarly, any payments made under an MSA needed to reflect the market value of the services rendered.

PHH Corp. was fined $109 million in June 2015, after Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray overruled an administrative law judge's findings regarding payments on reinsurance agreements. PHH and the CFPB remain entangled in a lawsuit contesting the bureau's finding, as well as PHH's legal challenge that the single-director structure of the agency represents an unconstitutional concentration of executive power.

While the ongoing appeals in the PHH case continue to complicate questions about the CFPB's RESPA enforcement powers, the agency has issued warnings about the use of MSAs, stating that in some cases, payments made to lenders for advertising settlement services were in reality disguised compensation for referrals.

MSAs on their face remain legal. However, the agency has refused to supply specific guidance on what constitutes an illegal MSA. "Any analysis of whether an MSA is legal or not is highly fact specific and not conductive to a simple yes or no answer," CFPB spokesman Sam Gilford said in response to an April 2016 query.

The initial court rulings and CFPB ambiguity has prompted Wells Fargo, Prospect Mortgage and PHH to cancel their existing MSAs, although the PHH Home Loans joint venture with Realogy remains in place.

Remax has had its own MSA-related struggles, too.

In November 2015, Remax and Quicken Loans entered into an MSA that ended abruptly in September when the two companies filed separate law suits against each other.

The agreement was on the franchisor level, not the franchisee level, Morrison said.

"It was never meant for the franchisees at all. Just like any marketing agreement, we had them as part of our website, as part of our conferences. It was a traditional sort of sponsorship agreement where we were providing access and marketing services, joint marketing services to them, across our network. There was no guarantee of business; there was no guarantee of anything. It was just an agreement to market together.

"It was a pretty simple deal. I think they just wanted out of all their MSAs" based on what was happening with the CFPB and its enforcement of RESPA, he said.

When asked if the collapse of the arrangement influenced Remax to create Motto Mortgage, "No, not at all. We had gone the path with Motto separately," said Morrison.

"Motto Mortgage was going to be something that we could provide to our franchisees to get them into the mortgage industry. So they were completely separate," he said.

Remax "breached its contractual obligations to Quicken Loans," the lender said in a statement.

"We repeatedly attempted to restructure the agreement to more accurately reflect the significantly lower level of commitment Remax was capable of delivering. Remax insisted on receiving full payment despite their failure to perform their obligations in the contract," the statement said, adding that that failure violated the RESPA requirement that marketing fees to third parties to be commensurate with the services provided.

"Our decisions and actions are always guided by a philosophy of 'doing the right thing.' We naturally expect our partners and the counter-parties of contracts we enter into to share the same principles. Clearly, honoring contractual commitments and following regulatory guidelines, including RESPA, are fundamental to our business philosophy," the Quicken Loans statement said.

Mortgage franchise businesses are common in Canada, Australia and New Zealand, Liniger added. "Franchising has succeeded in virtually every industry in the United States, and so it is an ideal way to expand the concept," he said.

Like any other mortgage brokerage, the franchisee can collect the yield-spread premium that the wholesaler pays for the loan. But because Motto will not be a licensed mortgage originator, the YSP cannot be passed back to the company. Instead, Motto Mortgage will collect a set monthly fee from the franchisees for use of the name and the marketing support it provides, Morrison said. It will also charge an initial fee of $20,000 per franchise.

Next in Origination ►
More in Origination See All »
Comments (2)
***CFPB WAKE UP*** 1st ReMax with Motto Mortgage and now Guaranteed Rate with Realology. These are blatantly illegal structures which promote steering, are anti-competitive and are injuring consumers.

MSA's and Joint Ventures where there are referrals involved are in themselves a RESPA violation which is a criminal statue. Entities and their affiliates governed by RESPA should not be allowed to provide more than 1 settlement service on a transaction. The CFPB should fine, order to pay restitution, and criminally prosecute individuals and entities who have blatantly violated RESPA in the past. The biggest offense is between mortgage and real estate companies. I own a NY mortgage company.
Posted by Jeffrey M | Friday, February 17 2017 at 9:32AM ET
Why does this sound like a "net branch" in new clothes to me?
Posted by jtetreault | Wednesday, February 15 2017 at 5:34PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.