-
The Supreme Court appointed Paul Clement to represent the agency after the bureau’s current director questioned its constitutionality.
January 15 -
The case before the court deals mainly with a statutory clause limiting the president’s ability to fire a CFPB director. But briefs filed with the court say striking that provision does not fully solve the bureau’s constitutional problems.
January 3 -
The high court scheduled oral arguments on March 3 in the lawsuit dealing with a president's ability to fire the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
November 26 -
The Supreme Court is ready to weigh in on the CFPB’s leadership structure, but both agencies are facing similar constitutional challenges, suggesting a broader impact of any decision.
November 4 -
A lower court “erred” when it sided with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s investors, the Justice Department said in its petition to the high court.
October 30 -
Will the justices go further than answering constitutional questions about the bureau's leadership structure?
October 21 -
The high court will decide how much latitude a president has to fire the director of an independent agency.
October 18 -
In her second day of congressional testimony, Kathy Kraninger took heat from Senate Democrats for weighing in on constitutional questions about her agency and for her enforcement track record.
October 17 -
A list of upcoming cases published by the high court did not include a challenge to the bureau's constitutionality, but the justices could still decide to review it at a later date.
October 15 -
The two Democrats waded into a court battle over the president's ability to fire a director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
October 8