Christopher Whalen

Wide short-term swings in interest rates — and loan prepayments — that we've all witnessed have serious secondary effects on consumers, lenders, investors and also policymakers.

An important traditional tool of monetary policy has been diminished and may even become counterproductive in the future.

Will the runoff of MSRs leave a hole in the capital of the mortgage finance industry?

The assumption that conservatorship can end without significant changes in how the GSEs operate may be the most dangerous one of all.

The shift to nonbank lenders will put the breaks on non-qualified mortgage and home equity line of credit origination growth.

Recapitalizing the GSEs by cutting off returns to the government would essentially be buying the GSEs from the taxpayers with money that belongs to the taxpayers.

Historically, rising interest rates have enabled banks to earn more, but this time around in the banking industry, like much else, things are a little different.

Some hopeful souls in Washington believe the commercial banking industry will return to originating and servicing higher-risk mortgages, but most banks are more likely to continue withdrawing from the sector.

Weak profits and the threat of false claims charges are keeping banks out of the market for loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Policymakers should differentiate between housing finance-related issues of real importance to the greater public interest, and those that concern only special interests.