-
The high court ruled June 29 that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau violated the separation of powers.July 9
-
The agency sought to provide certainty that most actions from the past eight years remain in effect despite the ruling that the bureau's leadership structure is unconstitutional.July 7
-
Legal experts say it is now more likely that the Supreme Court will strike down the single-director governance framework for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s regulator.July 2
-
The Supreme Court threw out a key statutory provision concerning the agency’s leadership structure, but the presidential election and possible legislative reforms could bring about more changes to the embattled bureau.June 29
-
In a split 5-4 decision, the justices gave presidents new power to remove the agency's head at will. The ruling could have far-reaching implications for other regulators with single directors.June 29
-
With just 13 decisions remaining on the docket this session, the high court's highly anticipated ruling in a case challenging the agency's leadership structure could come as early as next Monday.June 25
-
The court’s liberal bloc and Chief Justice John Roberts, who holds a crucial swing vote, appeared reluctant to remove a contentious provision that limits a president’s ability to fire a sitting director of the bureau.March 3
-
John Roberts could play a familiar role as the swing vote in determining whether the Supreme Court curbs the consumer bureau’s power.March 2
-
Democratic lawmakers, state attorneys general and others filed briefs with the Supreme Court rebutting claims that the agency’s leadership structure is unconstitutional.January 24
-
The Supreme Court appointed Paul Clement to represent the agency after the bureau’s current director questioned its constitutionality.January 15
